

| Evaluation Factor | All-in-One (Integrated) | All-in-Two (Split) |
|---|---|---|
| Brightness & Runtime (Highway Priority) |
Limited by compact design: Solar panel size (max ~1.2㎡) and battery capacity (max ~100Ah) restrict output to 5,000–8,000 lumens. Runtime may drop to 6–8 hours in cloudy weather (insufficient for 24/7 highway needs). |
No size constraints: Larger solar panels (1.5–3㎡) and high-capacity batteries (100–200Ah) deliver 8,000–20,000+ lumens. Supports 10–14 hours of continuous lighting (even in low sunlight) — meets highway “all-night” requirements. |
| Solar Energy Absorption |
Fixed panel angle (integrated into the fixture) — hard to optimize for latitude/season. Risk of shading from nearby structures/poles. |
Adjustable solar panel: Can be tilted to match local latitude (e.g., 30°–45° for optimal sun exposure) and mounted higher to avoid shading. Captures 20–30% more solar energy than all-in-one. |
| Durability & Environmental Resistance |
Compact design = higher wind load (risk of pole damage in storms). Components are cramped, leading to poor heat dissipation — battery life shortens in high temperatures (critical for highways in deserts or tropical regions). Vibration from traffic may loosen internal connections. |
Split design = lower wind resistance (solar panel mounted securely on pole top). Separate components allow better heat dissipation (battery/LED not exposed to direct sunlight with the panel), extending battery life by 30–50%. Sturdier wiring and mounts resist traffic vibrations. |
| Maintenance & Repairability | Fully integrated: If one component fails (e.g., battery or solar panel), the entire unit must be replaced. Highway maintenance requires cherry pickers — high replacement cost and downtime. | Modular design: Replace only faulty components (e.g., battery, LED) without removing the entire system. Solar panels can be inspected/cleaned separately (critical for dusty highways). Lower maintenance cost and shorter downtime. |
| Installation Complexity |
Simple: One unit, no wiring between panel and fixture. Faster installation (15–20 mins per pole). |
Slightly complex: Requires mounting the solar panel, running wires, and aligning the panel angle. Installation time (30–40 mins per pole) is longer but manageable with trained teams. |
| Cost (Initial vs. Long-Term) |
Lower initial cost ($200–$500 per unit) — attractive for budget-constrained projects. Higher long-term cost: Shorter lifespan (3–5 years) and frequent replacements. |
Higher initial cost ($400–$1,000 per unit) — offset by longer lifespan (5–8 years) and lower maintenance/ replacement costs. Total cost of ownership (TCO) is 40–60% lower over 5 years. |
| Suitability for Highway Lanes | Only viable for secondary highways, rural roads, or parking lot access roads (low traffic, moderate lighting needs). |


laisser un message
Numériser vers Wechat :
Numériser vers WhatsApp :